Taxation and economic growth: an evolutionary approach

Oleksander V. Gurnak

Abstract


Taxes play an extremely important role in assuring of the activities of the state, financing the production of public goods and income redistribution. At the same time, neither theoretical work, nor the facts can give the definite answer concerning the character and significance of the impact of taxes on the economic growth. The reason for such discrepancies in the obtained results can be ignorance of the existence of different tax populations and subpopulations. They are defined as groups of countries, which formed similar formal and informal tax institutions during the long socio-economic evolution.  In the paper the results of an empirical test of this hypothesis are given.

Methodology of the study was based on the construction of the procedure of stepwise selection and analysis of statistically adequate econometric models as for undivided sample of 117 countries, so as for different tax populations and subpopulations. In constructed models, economic growth was viewed as the dependent variable, and the tax ratio and the size of the shadow economy were considered as independent variables.

These results confirm the investigated hypothesis. Wherein, for the mixed tax populations’ countries, including subpopulations of Muslim countries, as well as a subpopulation of post-colonial countries of the European tax population, an increase in the effective tax rate contributes to real economic growth. In the tax subpopulation of Western European countries, the significant interrelation between the level of taxation and variations in real economic growth is absent. For Eastern European tax subpopulation including Ukraine, the increase in the real tax ratio leads to a fall in the real economic growth. This happens because of a clear priority of social spending and inadequate government funding programs for economic growth, and low efficiency of state institutions.


Keywords


economic growth; tax ratio; shadow economy; tax population; evolutionary economics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Engen, E. & Skinner, J. (1996). Taxation and economic growth. National Tax Journal, 49(4), 617-642.

Myles, G. (2000). Taxation and econo¬mic growth. Fiscal Studies, 21 (1), 141-168.

Lee, Y. & Gordon, R.H. (2005). Tax structure and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 1027-1043.

Scully, G. W. (2003). Optimal taxation, economic growth and income inequality. Public Choice, 115(3-4), 299-312. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024223916710

Scully, G. (2006). Taxes and economic growth. NCPA Policy Report (No. 292). Retrieved from http://www.ncpa.org/pdfs/st292.pdf.

Johansson, Å., Heady, C., Arnold, J., Brys, B. & Vartia, L. (2008). Tax and Economic Growth. OECD Economics Department Working Paper Series (Working Paper No. 620).

Arnold, J. M., Brys, B., Heady, C., Johansson, Å., Schwellnus, C., & Vartia, L. (2011). Tax Policy for Economic Recovery and Growth. The Economic Journal, 121(550), F59-F80.

Bird, R. (2010, October). Taxation and Development. The World Bank. Economic Premise №34. Retrieved from http://siteresources.world-bank.org/INTDEBTDEPT/Resources/468980-1172763902832/3508188-1286222049323/PRE-MEconPrem34.pdf.

McBride, W. (2012, December). What is the Evidence on Taxes and Growth? Tax Foundation Special Report No. 207. Retrieved from http://taxfoundation.org/article/what-evidence-taxes-and-growth.

Mazerov, M. (2013). Academic Research Lacks Consensus on the Impact of State Tax Cuts on Economic Growth. A Reply to the Tax Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.cbpp.org/files/6-17-13sfp.pdf.

Hodgson, G.M. (2007). Evolutionary and institutional economics as the new mainstream. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 4(1), 7-25. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14441/eier.4.7

Stoelhorst, J.W. (2008). The explanatory logic and ontological commitments of generalized Darwinism. Journal of Economic Methodology, 15(4), 343-363.

Witt, U. (2008). What is specific about evolutionary economics? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18(5), 547-575. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00191-008-0107-7

Vishnevskiy, V.P., Gurnak, O.V. & Vishnevskaya, E.N. (2012). Evolutionary theory and tax populations. Evropeyskiy vektor ekonomIchnogo rozvitku. Zbirnik naukovih prats, 2 (13), 167 – 172 [in Russian].

Vyshnevskyi, V.P., Gurnak, O.V. & Vyshnevska, O.M. (2012). Studying the ways of tax revenue systems development: neoclassical, institutional and evolutionary paradigms. Actual Problems of Economics, 11 (137), 9-18 [in Ukrainian].

Vishnevskaya, E.N. & Gurnak, A.V. (2013). Identification and analysis of the main tax populations. Naukoviy visnik Natsionalnogo universitetu derzhavnoyi podatkovoyi sluzhbi Ukrayini (ekonomika, pravo), 1(60), 39-44 [in Russian].

The Heritage Foundation (2011). Index of Economic Freedom. Download Row Data. Retrieved from http://www.heritage.org/index/excel/2011/index2011_data.xls.

The Heritage Foundation (2012). Index of Economic Freedom. Download Row Data. Retrieved from http://www.heritage.org/index/excel/2012/index2012_data.xls.

The Heritage Foundation (2013). Index of Economic Freedom. Download Row Data. Retrieved from http://www.heritage.org/index/excel/2013/index2013_data.xls.

Buehn, А. & Schneider, F. (2012). Shadow economies around the world: novel insights, accepted knowledge, and new estimates. International Tax and Public Finance, 19(1), 139-171.

Gurnak, A. (2013). Analysis of the tax burden in the context of different tax populations. Econ. Promisl., 4 (64), 60-68 [in Russian].


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.