National economies and national industrial systems in modern world: introduction to the problem

Elena M. Vishnevska

Abstract


The concept of national economy is proposed. It is offered to understand it not as the mechanical set of economic units, but as the evolving organism that has its own history and is characterized by a unique combination of driving forces of development in space and time. It is proved that each national economy represents something special, variant from other economies not only in quantitative aspect (according to numerical characteristics of constituent elements - the population, wealth, income, etc.), but first of all in qualitative aspect formed in space and time under the influence of geographical, socio-biological, language, religious, cultural, and other factors. All successful national economies in the modern world are externally very similar: they are the mixed units with a certain combination of the state and market, possessing the multilevel monetary, tax and budgetary systems, developed markets of factorsof production, modern industry, infrastructure, etc. However, from the substantial point of view those national economies which have risen quickly in the last decades build their systems of the social and economic relations in a different way than the western democracies. It is visible first of all from geographically and historically caused socio-cultural norms which are the cornerstone of economic transaction and mechanisms of administrative decisions making. It is proved that national economies are grouped in the economic populations which are forming under the influence of geographical, sociobiological, language, religious, cultural and other factors. This approach, based on evolutionary methodology, is characterized as a methodological populationism.The traditional typology of national economies also has important analytical value. In the last decades, for example, the concept of a variety of capitalisms has gained popularity in the world, according to which it suggests to distinguish on the basis of on one or several signs, for example, Anglo-Saxon, European-continental, Social-democratic, and Asian capitalisms. Such analysis really allows revealing important typical features of certain national economies which are the representatives of different populations. But, in principle, their direct comparison is insufficiently correct and constructive as it is more correct and constructive to compare not the separate social organisms relating to different populations but the organisms of one population or different populations among themselves.

Keywords


national economy; national industrial system; economic population; methodological populationism

Full Text:

PDF

References


Beck, U. & Sznaider, N. (2006). Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda. The British Journal of Sociology, 57 (1), 1-23.

Dopfer, K. & Potts, J. (2008). The General Theory of Economic Evolution. London, New York: Routledge.

Heymann, E. & Vetter, S. (2013). Europe's re-industriali¬sation. The gulf between aspiration and reality. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bank AG, DB Research.

Jessop, R.D. & Bertuzzi, M. D. (2006). Narrating the future of the national economy and the national state? Remarks on re-mapping regulation and re-inventing governance. Documentos y Aportes en Administración Pública y Gestión Estatal, 7, 7-44.

Merriam-Webster (2013). National economy. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/national-economy.

Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life (2011). The Future of the Global Muslim Po¬pulation. Projections for 2010-2030. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life.

The National Intelligence Council, USA (2012). Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds. Retrieved from https://globaltrends2030.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/global-trends-2030-november2012.pdf.

Weber, M. (1946). Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Wimmer, A. & Schiller, N. G. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond. Nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2 (4), 301-334.

Woodward, I., Skrbis, Z. & Bean, C. (2008). Attitudes towards globalization and cosmopolitanism: cultural diversity, personal consumption and the national economy. The British Journal of Sociolo-gy, 59 (2), 207-226. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00190.x.

Yang, B. & Huang, E. (2011). Characteristic of the Chinese Tax System and its Cultural Underpinnings: A Comparison with West. Journal of Chinese Tax & Policy, 1 (1), 13-33.

Al'bedil', M.F. (1997). Indian religion and philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.india.ru/india/history/hindi_history.shtml.

Wallerstein, I. M. (2006). The Modern World System: introduction. Moskow: Territorija budushhego Publishing house [in Russian].

Volpi, V. & Mazzei, F. (2012). Asian economic model and the West: the rematch of the "visible hand". Moskow: AST, Khranitel [in Russian].

Zhen'min' zhibao (2007). Follow the great path of socialism with Chinese characteristics with confidence. Retrieved from http://russian.people.com.cn/31521/6283130.html [in Russian].

UN (2013). Human Development Report 2013. The Rise of the South: Human Progress in a Diverse World. NewYork, USA: The United Nations Development Programme.

Robinson, J. (1986). The Economics of Imperfect Competition. Moskow: Progress Publishing house [in Russian].

Stiglitz, J. (1998). The instruments are more diverse, the goals are wider: the movement towards the post-Washington consensus. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 8, 4-34 [in Russian].

Fukuyama, F.Y. (2004). The End of History and the Last Man. Moskow: AST Publishing house, Ltd. [in Russian].

Jurlov, F.N. & Jurlova, E.S. (2010). History of India: XX century. Moskow: Institute of Oriental Studies, RAS [in Russian].


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.