Modern trends in corporate income taxation: perspectives of the withdrawn capital tax

Olesia V. Viietska


The paper substantiated that under the conditions of the digital revolution, which makes it difficult to perform tax control over income flows and expenses of enterprises, especially over cross-border ones, it is time to look for better alternatives to the taxation of enterprise’s profits.It is shown that not only a reduction in the corporate income tax rate and the provision of various preferences for investment and innovation activities, but also a radical change in approaches to taxation of corporate income, such as the transition to distributed profit tax or destination-based business cash flow tax can act as instruments of competition.The foreign experience of applying the distributed profit tax on the example of Estonia, Macedonia, Georgia and Latvia has been studied. It is justified, that the introduction of distributed profit tax instead of corporate income tax did not become such a factor that negatively affected economic events in the analyzed countries. Moreover, there is a reason to believe, that such«castling» contributed to the improvement of the situation, at least in one of the countries (Estonia).The analysis of the destination-based business cash flow tax as an alternative to the corporate income tax and the distributed profit tax were made. Differences between these types of taxes are demonstrated, their advantages and disadvantages are highlighted.It is shown, that the discussion of destination-based business cash flow tax indicates that alternative approaches to profit taxation are in the agenda in the countries of the world. This is also confirmed by modern studies, based on economic and mathematical modeling of situations, in which the corporate income tax rate is significantly reduced or the tax is completely eliminated. It is proved, that, based on the analysis of theory, international experience and the current situation in Ukraine, the introduction of a withdrawn capital tax will be the best alternative to the existing corporate income tax, which currently does not fulfill a stimulating function, but promotes corruption and evasion from payment to the budget. The results of calculations of possible budget losses from the replacement of the corporate income tax by the withdrawn capital tax are demonstrated. Possible measures to compensate such losses in the first years of the newtax introduction have been formulated.The necessity of continuing and deepening the analysis of the experience of countries, that have already switched to the collection of the distributed profit tax, as well as assessing the impact of introducing a withdrawn capital tax on attracting external and domestic capital investments using methods of economic and mathematical modeling, is validated.


corporate income tax; distributed profit tax; destination-based business cash flow tax; withdrawn capital tax

Full Text:



Auerbach, A.J. (2017). Demystifying the Destination-Based Cash-Flow. Tax. Brooking Paper on Economic Activity. BPEA Conference Drafts. Retrieved from

Benzella, S.G., Goryunov, E., Kazakovac, M., Lagardad, G., Nesterovae, K., Kotlikofff, J.L., & Zubarevg, A. (2015). Simulating Russia’s and Other Large Economies’ Challenging and In-terconnected Transitions. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working paper 21269. Retrieved from

Corruption Perception Index. Retrieved from

Devereux, M., & Auerbach, A. (2017). EU Wrong To Challenge Destination Based Cash Flow Tax. Forbs. Retrieved from

Digitalisation of tax. International perspectives (2016). ICAEW, the IT Faculty. 28 p. Retrieved from

Doing Business. Retrieved from

Estonia. Corporate - Taxes on corporate income (2018). PwC. Retrieved from

Fehr, H., Jokisch, S., Kambhampati, A., & Kotlikoff, L. (2013) Simulating the elimination of the U.S. corporate income tax. NBER, Working paper 19757. Retrieved from

Feldstein, M. (2017) Cutting US Corporate Tax Is Worth the Cost. Project Syndicate. Retrieved from

Feldstein, M. (2018) International Consequences of U.S. Tax Reform. Project Syndicate. Retrieved from

Georgia. Corporate - Taxes on corporate income (2018). PwC. Retrieved from

Gordon, R. (1990). Can Capital Income Taxes Survive in Open Economies? Journal of Finance, 47, рр. 1159-1180. Retrieved from

International Tax Competitiveness Index (2017). Retrieved from:

Latvia. Corporate - Taxes on corporate income (2018). PwC. Retrieved from

Macedonia. Corporate - Taxes on corporate income (2018). PwC. Retrieved from

Mankiw, N.G., Weinzierl, M., Yagan, D. (2009) Optimal Taxation in Theory and Practice. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 23, 4. рр. 147-174.

Mintz, J. (1995). The Corporation Tax: A Survey. Fiscal Studies, Vol. 16, 4, рр. 23-68.

Mooij, R.A. de (2005). Will Corporate Income Taxation Survive? De Economist, 153(3), рр. 277-301. doi: 10.1007/s10645-005-1989-5.

Musgrave, R., & Musgrave, R. (1984). Public Finance in Theory and Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill. 824 p.

Nicodéme G. (2008). Corporate income tax and economic distortions. CEB. Work-ing Paper 08/033. Retrieved from [accessed 5 May 2018].

Patel, E., & McClelland, J. (2017). What Would a Cash Flow Tax Look Like For U.S. Com-panies? Lessons from a Historical Panel. Office of Tax Analysis, Working Paper 16. Retrieved from

Paying Taxes. Retrieved from

Questions and Answers on the Action Plan for Fair and Efficient Corporate Taxa-tion in the EU (2015). European Commission. Fact Sheet. Retrieved from

Rosen, H.S. (1992). Public Finance. Burr Ridge. Illinois: Irwin. 657 p.

Samuelson, P.A. (1954). The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. Review of economic and Statistics, 36(4), рр. 387-389.

Shaviro, D. (2018). Goodbye to All That? A Requiem for the Destination-Based Cash Flow Tax. Bulletin for International Taxation, Vol. 72, 4/5. Retrieved from doi:

Sөrensen, P.B. (2005). Can Capital Income Taxes Survive? CESifo Economic Studies, 53(2), рр.172-228.

Tax Policy Reforms 2017. OECD and Selected Partner Economies (2017). OECD. Retrieved from

Tiebout, C.M. (1956) The Pure Theory of Local Expenditure. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), рр. 416-424.

Toder, E. (2017). What is the Difference between the Current Corporate Income Tax and a Destination-Based Cash Flow Tax? Retrieved from

Weichenrieder, A.D. (2005). (Why) Do We Need Corporate Taxation? CESifo, Working Paper 1495. Retrieved from [accessed 5 May 2018].

Wilson, J.D. (1986). A Theory of International Tax Competition. Journal of Urban economics, 19(3), рр. 296-315.

Zodrow, G.R. (1986). Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation, and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods. Journal of Urban economics, 19(3), рр. 356-370.

Vishnevsky, V.P. (1998). Taxation of enterprises in Ukraine. Doneck: IIE NAS of Ukraine. 328 р. [in Ukrainian].

Viietska, O. (2015). Harmonization of Enterprise Profit Taxation in the EU: Experience for Ukraine. Econ. promisl., 4, рр. 69-92. doi:10.15407/econindustry2015.04.069 [in Ukrainian].

Zaha, D., & Betlіj, O. (2017) Taxation of Distributed Profit: International Experience. German Advisory Group, The Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting. Analytical note, PB/03/2017. Retrieved from:

Zaha, D., Otten, T., Betlіj, O., & Dzhuchchі, R. (2017). Enterprise Profit Tax or Deferred Tax: Analysis and Recommendations. German Advisory Group, The Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting. Series of analytical researches, PS/01/2017.

Vishnevsky, V.P. (Ed.) (2006). Taxation: Theories, Problems, Solutions. Doneck: DonNTU, IIE NAS of Ukraine [in Russian].

The Draft law On the introduction of amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine on the tax liberalization (2018). 2351-VIII [in Ukrainian].

Vishnevsky, V.P. (Ed.) (2018). Smart industry in the era of digital economy: prospects, directions and mechanisms of development. Kiev: NAS of Ukraine, Іnstitute of Industrial Economics [in Russian].

Taptunova, І. (2016). Transformation of the corporate income tax into the tax on the withdrawn capital. European Information and Research Center. 44 р. Retrieved from:



  • There are currently no refbacks.