To confirm the hypothesis of the existence of several characteristic types of supranational innovation systems (SNIS), which can be found and identified, and to which all national macroeconomics in the world belong to with more or less degree of approximation, national and foreign experience in the development of appropriate classifications was considered. That includes: three-level taxonomy of national innovation systems (NIS) of the world (dated from 2005) with a special emphasis on innovation, dissemination of information and knowledge; two-level taxonomy of NIS of technologically developed OECD countries (dated from 2006); as well as the classification of tax populations, dated from 2018 (European, Chinese-East Asian, Indian-South Asian, Maghreb-middle East) and based on the "long" development trends.The considered approaches to supranational systems’ classification allow to estimate in detail their similarities and differences, depending on the structural elements, as well as the "weight" or the degree of influence of each main element on the final efficiency. However, these examples are more specific and narrowly focused than the developed typology of the SNIS-2018.The alternative scientific and methodological approach, offered in the paper, which is made on the basis of cluster analysis of 95 countries of the world, different in terms of economic and technological development, as well as geographical location, allows us to determine four distinctive types of SNIS in the context of the "Quadruple helix" model - co-evolutionary interaction of scientific, educational, industrial, economic, political and socio-cultural complexes. According to the proposed taxonomy has been allocated:type A SNIS - "developed countries with primarily inclusive institutions" - is a highly efficient type of innovative systems, which occupies the 1st place in the majority of classification criteria, except for the development of socio-cultural environment (2nd position);type B SNIS - "developing countries with mixed extractive-inclusive institutions with a strong socio-cultural component (predominantly Muslim and Buddhist-Hindu types)" - an average efficient type of innovative systems, which occupies the 1st place in terms of socio-cultural development, the 2nd - in terms of production, economic and political situation, the 3rd - in terms of the development of scientific and educational complex;type C SNIS - "developed countries and developing countries with mixed extractive-inclusive institutions with a strong informal component (including post-Soviet type)" - is a weakly efficient type of innovative systems, which mainly occupies the penultimate (3rd) place in most classification criteria, except for scientific and educational (2nd position) ones;type D SNIS - "developing countries with primarily extractive institutions" - is a low-efficient type of innovative systems, which occupies the last (4th) place in all classification criteria, forming the lower limit of the estimated range.The current situation of Ukraine in the context of the developed typology was characterized as follows: Ukraine belongs to type C SNIS; key indicators of the optimized sample lag behind the image of the average leader in its cluster; most of the target indicators belong to the group of state-political complex, which characterizes the low level of efficiency of national socio-economic institutions; according to the indicators of scientific and educational complex Ukraine's position is not significantly inferior to the leaders.

national innovative system; supranational innovative system; typology; cluster analysis; scientific and educational complex; industrial and economic complex; state-political complex; socio-cultural complex

Balzat M., Pyka A. Mapping national innovation systems in the OECD area. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation. 2006. Vol.2, № 1-2. P. 158-176. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTG.2006.009132

Edquist С., Nelson R., Mowery D., Fagerberg J. (eds.) Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges. The Oxford Hand-book of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2006. P. 181-208. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0007

Freeman C. The Economics of Hope: Essays on Technical Change and Economic Growth. London: Pinter. 1992.

Global Innovation Index. INSEAD, WIPO. URL: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org (дата обращения: 05.05.2018).

Godinho М., Mendonça S., Pereira T. Towards a taxonomy of innovation systems. Working Papers Department of Economics. 2005. № 13, 44 p.

Human Development Index. Доклад о человеческом развитии 2016. Человеческое развитие для всех и каждого. Программа развития ООН. М.: Изд-во «Весь Мир». 284 с.

IMF country information. International Monetary Fund. URL: https://www.imf.org/en/countries (дата обращения: 05.01.2019).

Lundvall B.-A. (eds.) National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter. 1992.

Mazur J. O. Evaluation of investment and innovative development of Ukrainian economy: evolutional approach. Економіка промисловості. 2014. № 1 (65). С. 44-55.

Metcalfe S., Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R. (eds.) The Diffusion of Innovations: An Interpretative Survey. Technology and Economic Theory. London: Pinter. 1988. P. 560-589.

Nelson R. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. N.Y.: Oxford University Press. 1993.

Schwab K. GC Report: The Global Competitiveness Report 2017-2018. World Economic Forum. Appendix D: Technical Notes and Sources. 2018. Р. 341-350.

Sustainable Energy for All (SE4ALL) database from the SE4ALL Global Tracking Framework World Bank, International Energy Agency, Energy Sector Management Assistance Program. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator (дата обращения: 24.12.2017).

These Are the World’s Most Innovative Countries. Bloomberg. URL: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-01-22/germany-nearly-catches-korea-as-innovation-champ-u-s-rebounds [Accessed 5 January 2019] (дата обращения: 05.01.2019).

Weatherbase. URL: http://www.weatherbase.com/weather/countryall.php3# (дата обращения: 05.05.2018).

Агаджанян А.С. Буддийский путь в XX веке: религиозные ценности и современная история стран тхеравады. М.: Наука. Издательская фирма «Восточная литература». 1993. URL: https://webshus.ru/20576 (дата обращения: 02.12.2018).

Аджемоглу Д., Робинсон Дж. А. Почему одни страны богатые, а другие бедные. Происхождение власти, процветания и нищеты; пер. с англ. Д. Литвинова, П. Миронова, С. Сановича. М.: АСТ. 2016. 693 с.

Амоша О. І., Ніколаєнко А. І. Національна інноваційна система України в контексті міжнародних порівнянь. Економічний вісник Донбасу. 2015. № 1 (39). С. 115-121.

Бахарева Т.В. Неформальные институты как объект научного анализа. Вестник Саратовского государственного социально-экономического университета. 2012. №. 5. С. 12-16.

Вишневский В., Гончаренко Л., Гурнак А., Вишневская Е. Наднациональные модели налоговых систем: от Китая до Магриба (Китайско-Восточноазиатская, Индийско-Южноазиатская и Магрибско-Ближневосточная налоговые популяции): монография. М.: Магистр: ИНФРА-М, 2018. 272 с.

Голиченко О. Г. Национальная инновационная система: от концепции к методологии исследования. URL: http://institutiones.com/innovations/2523-nacionalnaya-innovacionnaya-sistema.html (дата обращения: 02.12.2018).

Индекс готовности к будущему. Совместный проект международного дискуссионного клуба «ВАЛДАЙ» и ВЦИОМ. М. 2017. 25 с. URL: https://wciom.ru/fileadmin/file/reports_conferences/2017/2017-10-18_igb.pdf (дата обращения: 02.12.2018).

Кузнецов Д.В. Национальная инновационная система: проблема дефиниции. Транспортное дело России. 2009. С. 96-99.

Ніколаєнко А.І. Механізм забезпечення розвитку національної інноваційної системи України: автореф. дис. … канд. екон. наук: 08.00.03. Київ, 2016. 24 с.

Паппэ Я., Галухина Я. Российский крупный бизнес: первые 15 лет. Экономические хроники 1993-2008 гг. М.: Издательский дом ГУВШЭ. 2009. С. 213-216.

Путь к достижению всеохватывающего и устойчивого промышленного развития. Лимская декларация. 2014. URL: https://unido.org/sites/default/files/2014-04/Lima_Declaration_RU_web_0.pdf (дата обращения: 02.12.2018).

Федулова Л., Пашута М. Розвиток національної інноваційної системи України. Економіка України. 2005. № 4. С. 35-47.

Шарко М. Модель формування національної інноваційної системи України. Економіка України. 2005. № 8. С. 25-30.