Social responsibility in supply chains of cement industry enterprises: international dimension

Olena O. Oliinyk

Abstract


The purpose of this article is to examine approaches to socially responsible supply chain management in the cement industry based on a content analysis of corporate documents issued by the world’s largest cement producers. It has been determined that cooperation with suppliers based on the principles of social responsibility has a direct positive impact on the financial performance of a cement company. This finding underscores the crucial role of institutional mechanisms of control, standardisation, and alignment of requirements within supply chains. A content analysis of supplier codes of conduct of Holcim, Heidelberg Materials and CRH was carried out using the text analytics tools of Voyant Tools. The results revealed substantial differences in semantic emphases, regulatory strictness and approaches to integrating corporate social responsibility into supply chain management. Holcim adheres to a socio-ethical model that combines managerial standards with a strong focus on workers’ rights and a corporate culture of integrity. Heidelberg Materials follows a normative-legal model built on strict compliance with international conventions, labour standards and technical environmental regulations. CRH demonstrates a process- and stakeholder-oriented model dominated by sustainability, risk management and due diligence. Despite a shared regulatory foundation, each document demonstrates its own emphases, which shape the company’s distinctive “social responsibility profile”. Taken together, these approaches reflect the spectrum of contemporary responsible sourcing practices in the cement industry and demonstrate how global companies are institutionalizing CSR in their interactions with their counterparties. The practical value of the study lies in deepening the understanding of mechanisms for shaping socially responsible supply chains in the cement industry, which can be used to improve corporate policies and enhance the resilience of supply chains.


Keywords


social responsibility, sustainable development, suppliers, supply chains, ESG concept, enterprise, cement industry

References


Kaspruk, O. V. (2025). Methodological principles for assessing operational competitiveness: A case study of a cement manufacturing enterprise. Economy of Industry, 3(111), 88—97. https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry.2025.03.088 [in Ukrainian].

Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of machine Learning research, 3(Jan), 993—1022.

Cooper, M. (2024). Sustainable Procurement Practices: Exploring Environmental and Social Criteria in Supplier Evaluation [preprint article]. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202407.0752.v1

Das, A. (2024). Predictive value of supply chain sustainability initiatives for ESG performance: a study of large multinationals. Multinational Business Review, 32(1), 20—40. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-09-2022-0149

Esan, O., Ajayi, F. A., & Olawale, O. (2024). Supply chain integrating sustainability and ethics: Strategies for modern supply chain management. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 22(1), 1930—1953. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.22.1.1259

Hana, A., & Tarik, K. (2025). Global Supply Chains and Corporate Social Responsibility: Navigating Ethical and Sustainable Business Practices. African Scientific Journal, 3(30), 230—230. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15607411

Holsim (2025a). ESG ratings, documents and reports. https://www.holcim.com/sustainability/esg/esg-policies-documents-reports

Holcim (2024). Integrated Annual Report. https://www.holcim.com/sites/holcim/files/docs/28022025-finance-holcim-fy-2024-report-full-en.pdf

Lin, Y., & Li, S. (2025). Supply chain resilience, ESG performance, and corporate growth. International Review of Economics & Finance, 97, 103763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103763

Miller, S. A., Habert, G., Myers, R. J., & Harvey, J. T. (2021). Achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions in the cement industry via value chain mitigation strategies. One Earth, 4(10), 1398—1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.09.011

Müller, C. (2023). How standards support sustainability of cement and concrete in Europe. Cement and Concrete Research, 173, 107288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107288

Holsim (2025b). Our supply chain commitments. https://www.holcim.com/sustainability/sustainable-supply-chain/our-supply-chain-commitments

Panagoda, S. S., Ranasinghe, H., Perera, V., Sandunika, I., Tilanka, G., Alwis, S., & Dilka, S. (2023). Cement manufacturing process and its environmental impact. J. Res. Technol. Eng, 4(3), 161—168.

Patil, V., Tan, T., Rispens, S., Dabadghao, S. S., & Demerouti, E. (2022). Supplier sustainability: A comprehensive review and future research directions. Sustainable Manufacturing and Service Economics, 1, 100003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smse.2022.100003

Purwanti, A. & Utami, E.Y. (2025). How Companies Manage Risk in the Supply Chain Through an ESG Approach? West Science Accounting and Finance, 3(02), 242—249. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsaf.v3i02.2075

Rasmi, S. A. B., & Türkay, M. (2023). Sustainability analysis of cement supply chains considering economic, environmental and social effects. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 8, 100112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2023.100112

Holsim (2021). Responsible sourcing in our supply chain. Code of business conduct for suppliers. https://www.holcim.com/sites/holcim/files/documents/2021_coc_a5_english-final.pdf

Santos, C. R. D., de Oliveira, U. R., & Aprigliano, V. (2025). Supplier Risk in Supply Chain Risk Management: An Updated Conceptual Framework. Applied Sciences, 15(13), 7128. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137128

Schmidt, W., Commeh, M., Olonade, K., Schiewer, G. L., Dodoo-Arhin, D., Dauda, R., & oth. (2021). Sustainable circular value chains: from rural waste to feasible urban construction materials solutions. Developments in the Built Environment, 6, 100047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2021.100047

Sodik, A., Cahyadi, E. R., & Mulyati, H. (2025). Sustainable supply chain in the cement sectors: Implications for environmental policy and education in Indonesia. Journal of Environment and Sustainability Education, 3(2), 180—188. https://doi.org/10.62672/joease.v3i2.86

Heidelberg Materials (2024). Supplier Code of Conduct. https://www.heidelbergmaterials.com/en/sustainability/esg-documents-and-policies

CRH (2025). Supplier Code of Conduct. https://www.crh.com/our-sustainability/codes-of-conduct/

Trinh, T., & Zhao, H. (2024). The effect of supplier CSR on customer–supplier relationship. Journal of Business Research, 185, 114909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114909

Uratani, J. M., & Griffiths, S. (2023). A forward looking perspective on the cement and concrete industry: Implications of growth and development in the Global South. Energy Research & Social Science, 97, 102972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.102972

Vandenbroucke, S., Kantorowicz, J., & Erkens, Y. (2023). Decoding supplier codes of conduct with content and text as data approaches. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(1), 472—492. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2580

Yang, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2024). The impact of suppliers' CSR controversies on buyers' market value: The moderating role of social capital. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 30(1), 100904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2024.100904

Yosef, F. A., Jum’a, L., & Alatoom, M. (2023). Identifying and categorizing sustainable supply chain practices based on triple bottom line dimensions: evaluation of practice implementation in the cement industry. Sustainability, 15(9), 7323. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097323

Yu, M. J., & Yu, Y. (2025). The Impact of ESG Performance on Corporate Bargaining Power: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms [preprint article]. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5349287

Yu, Y., Xu, J., Huo, B., Zhang, J. Z., & Cao, Y. (2023). The impact of supply chain social responsibility on sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 385, 135666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135666

Yuan, Y., Dai, H., & Ma, J. (2025). The Impact of Corporate ESG Performance on Supply Chain Resilience: A Mediation Analysis Based on New Quality Productive Forces. Sustainability, 17(10), 4418. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104418

Zhou, Y., Zhang, N., Wu, C. H., Wang, Y., Zhang, X., & Zhang, D. (2024). The Impact of Supply Chain ESG Management on Supply Chain Resilience With Emerging IT Technologies: Based on Supply Chain Network Capabilities. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 36(1), 1—31. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.356497

Received: 18.12.2025

Accepted: 20.01.2026

Published: 26.03.2026




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2026.01.053

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.