A model for classifying the technological complexity of goods, services and works based on Industry 4.0 principles
Abstract
The article substantiates the need to move from generalized assessments of the level of digitalization of enterprises and industries toward a process-oriented approach suitable for practical application in state industrial policy. It is shown that the current system for confirming the degree of product localization already generates a substantial body of administrative and economic data. However, the existing procedure does not make it possible to determine the actual compliance of a specific production process with the principles of Industry 4.0 or to distinguish the fragmented use of digital tools from systemic technological modernization.
A technological gradation from T0 to T5 has been developed, the content and assessment criteria for six dimensions have been defined, a formula for calculating the Basic Technology Index has been proposed, and threshold conditions for assigning assessed objects to the respective levels have been substantiated. The practical significance of the model for business and the economy has been determined, as its application will contribute to greater comparability of assessed objects, technological modernization, and targeted reindustrialization.
The main advantages and limitations of the proposed model have been analyzed, while the conditions for its practical application and the potential risks associated with its scaling have been identified. Using hypothetical examples, the procedure for assessing the technological maturity of production processes, calculating the Basic Technology Index, and assigning goods, services, and works to the relevant levels has been demonstrated. Further research directions have also been identified, including testing the model on actual data, refining weighting coefficients and threshold values, developing sector-specific interpretations of the indicators, digitalizing the assessment procedure, and gradually supplementing the model with indicators of human-centricity, sustainability, and resilience in accordance with the principles of Industry 5.0.
Keywords
Full Text:

PDF (Українська)
References
Amosha, O. I., & Nikiforova, V. A. (2019). Development of metallurgical smart industry in Ukraine: prerequisites, problems, features, and consequences. Kyiv: NAS of Ukraine, Institute of Industrial Economics [in Ukrainian].
Bryukhovetska, N. Yu., & Chorna, O. A. (2019). Intellectualization as a priority direction of industrial enterprise development in the conditions of Industry 4.0. Econ. promisl., 4 (88), 28—57. https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2019.04.028 [in Ukrainian].
Vyshnevskyi, V. P., & Kniaziev, S. I. (2017). Smart industry: prospects and challenges. Economy of Ukraine, 7 (668), 22—37 [in Ukrainian].
Vyshnevskyi, O. S. (2020). Impact of digitalization on industry: problems of definition in EU countries. Econ. promisl., 1 (89), 31—44. https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2020.01.031 [in Ukrainian].
Dasiv, A. F., Madykh, A. A., & Okhten, A. A. (2019). Modelling the assessment of smart-industrialization level. Econ. promisl., 2 (86), 107—125. https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2019.02.107 [in Russian].
Zaloznova, Yu. S., & Chekina, V. D. (2023). Theoretical principles of financial and economic stimulation of the development of smart industry. Econ. promisl., 4 (104), 47—64. https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2023.04.047 [in Ukrainian].
Zaloznova, Yu. S., & Chekina, V. D. (2025). Stimulating the development of smart industry in the spatial aspect: experience for Ukraine. Econ. promisl., 1 (109), 3—19. https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2025.01.003 [in Ukrainian].
Liashenko, V. I., & Vyshnevskyi, O. S. (2018). Digital modernization of Ukraine’s economy as an opportunity for breakthrough development. Kyiv: NAS of Ukraine, Institute of Industrial Economics. https://iie.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/monografiyi/2017/Lyashenko_Vishnevsky_2018.pdf [in Ukrainian].
De Carolis, A., Macchi, M., Negri, E., & Terzi, S. (2017). A maturity model for assessing the digital readiness of manufacturing companies. In H. Lödding, R. Riedel, K.-D. Thoben, G. von Cieminski, & D. Kiritsis (Eds.), Advances in Production Management Systems. The Path to Intelligent, Collaborative and Sustainable Manufacturing (IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Vol. 513, pp. 13—20). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66923-6_2
Frank, A. G., Dalenogare, L. S., & Ayala, N. F. (2019). Industry 4.0 technologies: implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 15—26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.004
Gomes, P. C., Oliveira, J. C. F., Tavares, K. J. T., Melo, F. J. C., & Guimaraes Junior, D. S. (2025). Industry 4.0 maturity model: an assessment in manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 50 (1), 23—52. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2025.144185
Hatzichronoglou, T. (1997). Revision of the high-technology sector and product classification. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 1997/02. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/134337307632
Schuh, G., Anderl, R., Dumitrescu, R., Krüger, A., & ten Hompel, M. (Eds.). (2020). Industrie 4.0 Maturity Index: Managing the Digital Transformation of Companies — Update 2020. Munich: acatech. https://en.acatech.de/publication/industrie-4-0-maturity-index-update-2020/
Mittal, S., Khan, M. A., Romero, D., & Wuest, T. (2018). A critical review of smart manufacturing and Industry 4.0 maturity models: implications for small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 49, 194—214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.10.005
Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffmann, A., & Giovannini, E. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264043466-en
Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2016). A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia CIRP, 52, 161—166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040
Schumacher, J., & Gronau, N. (2023). Comparing Industry 4.0 maturity models. Industry 4.0 Science, 39 (1), 16—33. https://doi.org/10.30844/I4SE.23.1.16
Vyshnevskyi, O., & Bozhyk, M. (2025). Smart manufacturing as a strategic determinant of Ukraine’s industrial policy amid global structural transformations. Journal of European Economy, 24 (3), 308—333. https://doi.org/10.35774/jee2025.03.308
Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L., & Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56 (8), 2941—2962. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806
Zeller, V., Hocken, C., & Stich, V. (2018). acatech Industrie 4.0 Maturity Index — A multidimensional maturity model. In I. Moon, G. M. Lee, J. Park, D. Kiritsis, & G. von Cieminski (Eds.), Advances in Production Management Systems. Smart Manufacturing for Industry 4.0 (IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, Vol. 536, pp. 105—113). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99707-0_14
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2026.03.003
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.





