The system of factors and an adaptive-integrated model for managing the competitiveness of wood-processing enterprises (SMART-WOOD)
Abstract
The competitiveness of Ukrainian wood-processing enterprises is shaped by a complex and volatile combination of internal and external factors, whose influence in 2025–2026 is markedly intensified by martial law, a shrinking raw-material base, EU-integration requirements (the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), the European Green Deal) and the need to shift toward deep wood processing. The purpose of the article is to systematize the competitiveness factors of wood-processing enterprises into a coherent multi-level system and to substantiate an adaptive-integrated conceptual model for competitiveness management (SMART-WOOD). Based on a generalization of recent research (2018–2026) and the application of systemic, process and adaptive approaches, seven groups of internal factors (raw-material, production-technological, innovation, personnel, financial-economic, marketing, organizational-managerial) and seven groups of external factors (resource, market, institutional-legal, environmental, scientific-technological, logistical, socio-economic and geopolitical) were identified and preliminarily ranked by degree of influence through expert-analytical generalization. It is established that raw-material and production-technological internal factors, together with resource, institutional-legal and socio-economic and geopolitical external factors, exert the strongest influence on the sector’s competitiveness. A conceptual model SMART-WOOD was developed and formalized as a six-component system ⟨F, M, T, I, R, FB⟩ that integrates the subsystem of influencing factors, the controlling subsystem, functional management mechanisms (production-technological, innovation, marketing, financial-economic, personnel, environmental), a management toolkit (SWOT and PESTLE analysis, Balanced Scorecard, KPI, ERP/CRM/BI systems), a system of performance indicators, and an adaptive feedback mechanism. The scientific novelty lies in combining systemic, process and adaptive approaches within a single sector-specific competitiveness management model that ensures cyclicity, continuous adjustment of managerial decisions and consideration of the specific features of wood-processing production. The findings provide a methodological basis for the subsequent integral assessment of the competitiveness of wood-processing enterprises and for substantiating managerial decisions aimed at its improvement under conditions of digital transformation, greening of production and European integration.
Keywords
Full Text:

PDF (Українська)
References
Amosha, O. I., & Soldak, M. O. (2026). Methodological framework for identifying economic reconstruction trajectories of territories under prolonged threats. Ekon. promisl., 1(113), 3—20. https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2026.01.003 [in Ukrainian].
Hubarieva, I. O., & Yaroshenko, I. V. (2020). Assessment of the competitiveness of the timber processing complex of Ukraine and the EU. Problemy Ekonomiky, 1(43), 13—19. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2020-1-13-19 [in Ukrainian].
Diuh, Yu. (2026, April 15). Wood-processing strategy until 2030: 7 priorities that should finally bring order to the sector. LIGA.Blogs. https://blog.liga.net/user/yudiuh/article/59142 [in Ukrainian].
Wood Industry UA. (2025–2026). The Green Book of the wood-processing and furniture industry of Ukraine. Economic Platform «Wood Industry UA» of the Federation of Employers of Ukraine. https://www.openforest.org.ua/314061/ [in Ukrainian].
Rudiuk, Ya., & Shuliar, R. (2025). A comprehensive model for optimizing the development of enterprises’ innovation activity under extreme conditions. Naukovyi Visnyk Chernivetskoho Natsionalnoho Universytetu imeni Yuriia Fedkovycha. Seriia: Ekonomika, 3, 102—108. https://doi.org/10.32782/ecovis/2025-3-15 [in Ukrainian].
Snihova, O. Yu. (2026). Management of technological transformation of industry: Synchronizing motivational imperatives and transformational potential to cover digital gaps with the EU markets. Ekon. promisl., 1 (113), 21—37. https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2026.01.021 [in Ukrainian].
Sozanskyi, L. (2019). A comparative assessment of the raw-material potential of the wood-processing industry of Ukraine and the EU countries. Sotsialno-Ekonomichni Problemy i Derzhava, 1 (20), 166—173. https://doi.org/10.33108/sepd2019.01.166 [in Ukrainian].
Tkachenko, A. M., & Mezherytskyi, D. A. (2026). Innovative models for assessing the effectiveness of economic development projects in the context of digital transformation. Ekon. promysl., 1 (113), 38—52. https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2026.01.038 [in Ukrainian].
Torosov, A. S., & Zhezhkun, I. M. (2021). Regional structure of timber harvesting and consumption in Ukraine. Naukovyi Visnyk NLTU Ukrainy, 31 (4), 93—97. https://doi.org/10.36930/40310415 [in Ukrainian].
Ali, A., & Russell, J. D. (2025). Accelerating the transition to wood-based circular bioeconomy: A literature review of current state, trends, opportunities, and priorities for future research. Current Forestry Reports, 11, 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-025-00255-7
Bozzolan, N., Grassi, G., Mohren, F., & Nabuurs, G. J. (2024). Options to improve the carbon balance of the harvested wood products sector in four EU countries. GCB Bioenergy, 16 (1), e13104. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.13104
Dragomir, M., Tofană, S., Dragomir, D., Țîțu, A. M., & Popescu, D. (2023). Assessing circularity in the wood industry — Methodology, tool and results. Forests, 14 (10), 1935. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14101935
Forster, E. J., Healey, J. R., Newman, G., & Styles, D. (2023). Circular wood use can accelerate global decarbonisation but requires cross-sectoral coordination. Nature Communications, 14, 6766. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42499-6
Held, P., Heubeck, T., & Meckl, R. (2025). Boosting SMEs’ digital transformation: The role of dynamic capabilities in cultivating digital leadership and digital culture. Review of Managerial Science, 20, 1687–1715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00919-5
UNIDO. (2023). Industrial development report 2024: Turning progress into resilience. United Nations Industrial Development Organization.
Krišťáková, S., Antov, P., Sedliačiková, M. et al. (2021). Efficiency of wood-processing enterprises — Evaluation based on DEA and MPI. Forests, 12 (12), 1640. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12121640
Lu, T. (2026). Navigating foundational uncertainty: A dynamic-adaptive model of enterprise digital transformation in the age of generative AI. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13, 451. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06689-z
OECD. (2024). Measuring the digital transformation: A roadmap for the future. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264311992-en
Pramreiter, M., Konnerth, J. et al. (2023). A review of the resource efficiency and mechanical performance of commercial wood-based building materials. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 37, e00632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00632
Sun, Y., Wang, F., Lin, W., Dai, Y., & Lin, J. (2025). Timber industrial policies and export competitiveness: Evidence from China’s wood-processing sector in the context of sustainable development. Forests, 16 (8), 1232. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16081232
Szichta, P., Risse, M., Weber-Blaschke, G., & Richter, K. (2024). Environmental potentials from wood cascading: A future-oriented consequential yet dynamic approach considering market and time-dependent biogenic carbon effects for selected scenarios under German conditions. Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy, 9, 100103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcb.2024.100103
Vieira, H., Corticeiro, S., Brás, G. R., & Lillebø, A. I. (2024). Forest certification and economic insights: A European perspective. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 7, 1464837. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1464837
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2026.03.075
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.





