The impact of artificial intelligence as a disruptive and closing technologies on industrial economics: a set of tasks for scientific comprehension and resolution

Yuliya S. Zaloznova, Oleksandr S. Vyshnevskyi, Danylo Yu. Cherevatskyi, Maryna S. Bozhyk

Abstract


This article investigates the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the industrial economy, analyzing it from the perspective of two competing theories: disruptive and closing innovation. The research is highly relevant due to the significant growth in investments (Nvidia's capitalization surpassed $5 trillion in October 2025) and AI's influence on global industrial production. This is particularly crucial for Ukraine, given the prospects for the transfer of military-oriented AI into the civilian economy.

The literature review identifies two main groups of academics: proponents (AI as the core of Industry 4.0) and critics (AI primarily automates existing tasks, potentially leading to "over-automation" and a decrease in GDP).

This contradiction forms the basis for two competing hypotheses:

  1. AI is a Disruptive Innovation, which changes markets and creates new players.
  2. AI is a Closing Innovation, which merely improves existing products and strengthens the position of current market leaders.

A comparative analysis of AI was conducted based on criteria such as the impact on the product, the customer, market dominance, and the institutional space. The study demonstrates that AI represents a complex innovative phenomenon that simultaneously exhibits characteristics of both types of technologies:

-  Closing Role: AI improves existing platforms and products of market giants (Microsoft Copilot, Google AI Overviews, Siri), thereby strengthening their dominance.

-  Disruptive Role: AI creates fundamentally new products (ChatGPT, Grok), attracts new customers, and shapes new specialized legislation.

The dual nature of AI presents several challenges, notably the lack of economic theory and tools for quantitative assessment of its effects at the micro-, meso-, and macro-levels.

A list of key scientific challenges requiring resolution is formulated:

  1. Defining the theoretical foundations of AI's micro-, meso-, and macro-level impact as both disruptive and closing technologies.
  2. Substantiating the assessment methodology and testing the hypothesis regarding AI's statistically significant impact.
  3. Identifying economic constraints, minimizing risks, and systemizing directions for stimulating AI adoption.
  4. Substantiating recommendations for updating Ukraine's national industrial policy, institutional regulation (including taxation), and ensuring the economic efficiency of AI utilization.

Understanding the dual nature of AI is crucial for economic forecasting and strategizing. Although AI possesses powerful disruptive potential, its implementation is currently dominated by incumbent large companies, which does not lead to the "disruption" of their positions. Addressing the outlined challenges is necessary for the urgent actualization of Ukraine's industrial policy.


Keywords


industrial economy, disruptive technology, closing technology, artificial intelligence (AI)

References


Vyshnevskyi, O. S. (2021). Digital platformization of the process of strategizing the development of the national economy. Monograph. Institute of Industrial Economics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. https://iie.org.ua/monografiyi/cifrova-platformizacija-procesu-strateguvannja-rozvitku-nacionalnoi-ekonomiki/ [in Ukrainian].

Heits, V. M. (2022). Social reality in the digital space. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 1 (722), 3—28. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.01.003 [in Ukrainian].

Hrytsenko, A. A. (2022). Information-digital stage of development of socio-economic systems. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 65 (1 (722)), 29—46. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.01.029 [in Ukrainian].

Sariohlo, V. H. (2024). Applied information economics: Socio-economic aspect. Monograph. Institute for Demography and Quality of Life, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Uman: Sochynskyi M. M. https://idss.org.ua/arhiv/sarioglo2024.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Vyshnevskyi, V. P., Vietska, O. V., Harkushenko, O. M., Kniaziev, S. I., Liakh, O. V., Chekina, V. D., & Cherevatskyi, D. Yu. (2018). Smart industry in the era of the digital economy: Prospects, directions, and mechanisms of development. In V. P. Vyshnevskyi (Ed.). Monograph. Institute of Industrial Economics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. https://iie.org.ua/monografiyi/smart-promislovist-v-epohu-tsifrovoyi-ekonomiki-perspektivi-napryami-i-mehanizmi-rozvitku/ [in Ukrainian].

Taranych, A. V., & Pelekhatskyi, D. O. (2024). The use of artificial intelligence in the processes of strategic management of enterprises. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 67 (1 (746)), 54—65. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2024.01.054 [in Ukrainian].

Tarasevych, V. M. (2022). Modern co-revolution: a mechanized manand/or a humanized machine. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 65 (2 (723)), 20—36. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.02.020 [in Ukrainian].

Ambartsoumean, V. M., & Yampolskiy, R. V. (2021). Artificial intelligence risk skepticism. (arXiv preprint, arXiv:2105.02704). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.02704

Banerjee, A., & Duflo, E. (2020). Good economics for hard times: Better answers to our biggest problems. Penguin Random House. 402 p.

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021, March 3–10). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In FAccT ’21: Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610—623). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Christensen, C. M. (2015). The innovator's dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Davidson, S. (2024) The economic institutions of artificial intelligence. Journal of Institutional Economics, 20, 1—16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137423000395

Derigent, W., Cardin, O., & Trentesaux, D. (2021). Industry 4.0: contributions of holonic manufacturing control architectures and future challenges. J Intell Manuf, 32, 1797—1818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01532-x

Ekbia, H. R. (2008) The quest for non-biological intelligence. In Artificial dreams (pp. vii—viii). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802126

Huang, Z., Shen, Y., Li, J., Fey, M., & Brecher, C. (2021). Survey on AI-Driven Digital Twins in Industry 4.0: Smart Manufacturing and Advanced Robotics. Sensors, 21, 6340. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196340

Huang, J. (2023). Digital Engineering Transformation with Trustworthy AI towards Industry 4.0: Emerging Paradigm Shifts. (arXiv preprint, arXiv:2301.00951v1). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.00951

Kumpulainen, S., & Terziyan, V. (2022). Artificial general intelligence vs. Industry 4.0: Do they need each other? Procedia Computer Science, 200, 140—150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.213

Larson, E. J. (2021). The Myth of Artificial Intelligence: Why Computers Can’t Think the Way We Do. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/file/feeds/PDF/9780674278660_sample.pdf

Meindl, B., & Mendonça, J. (2021). Mapping Industry 4.0 technologies: From cyber physical systems to artificial intelligence. (arXiv preprint, arXiv:2111.14168). https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.14168

Moeuf, A., Pellerin, R., Lamouri, S., Tamayo-Giraldo, S., & Barbaray, R. (2017). The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 56 (3), 1—19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1372647

European Parliament. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. Laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending regulations... (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj

Robbins, L. C. (1945). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. Macmillan and Co. https://milescorak.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/robbins-essay-nature-significance-economic-science.pdf

Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum. https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/3385454/Schwab-The_Fourth_Industrial_Revolution_Klaus_S.pdf

Schwab, K. (2024). Chapter 2: The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it means, how to respond1. Handbook of Research on Strategic Leadership in the Fourth Industrial Revolution (pp. 29—34). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802208818.00008

The President of the United States. (2023). Safe, secure, and trustworthy development and use of artificial intelligence (Exec. Order No. 14110). Federal Register, 88 (210). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-11-01/pdf/2023-24283.pdf

Tam, C., Grimal, P., Hays, J.-M., Kim, H. (2024, July 5). A global breakdown of how the energy sector is paid for: by governments, private firms, households. https://energypost.eu/a-global-breakdown-of-how-the-energy-sector-is-paid-for-by-governments-private-firms-households/

Turing, A. (1948) Intelligent machinery. B. Jack Copeland, 395. https://weightagnostic.github.io/papers/turing1948.pdf

Vyshnevskyi, O. S., Anufriiev, M. Yu., Bozhyk, M. S., & Gulchuk, T. O. (2024). Artificial intelligence as a core of the new industrial revolution: prospects and limitations. Econ. promisl., 3 (107), 5—21. http://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2024.03.005

Windmann, A., Goswami, M., & Hellingrath, B. (2024). Artificial intelligence in Industry 4.0: A review of integration challenges for industrial systems. (arXiv preprint, arXiv:2405.18580). https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18580


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.