The impact of the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) on the metallurgical sector of Ukraine: pathways for adaptation

Denys P. Bozhyk

Abstract


This article analyzes the impact of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) on Ukraine’s iron and steel industry. Beginning in 2026, CBAM significantly escalates regulatory pressure on Ukrainian iron and steel exports to the EU due to the high carbon intensity of traditional BF-BOF (blast furnace–basic oxygen furnace) technologies. The purpose of the study is to determine the adaptation pathways for the domestic steel sector, accounting for the time horizon and capital intensity of the proposed measures. Three key adaptation dimensions are identified: informational (improving MRV reporting quality and transitioning away from default carbon intensity values), commercial (diversifying export flows and optimizing carbon cost pass-through), and technological (transitioning to low-carbon technologies, specifically DRI-EAF). The findings demonstrate that effective adaptation requires pairing short-term organizational measures with long-term technological modernization. CBAM is examined not only as a threat risking the loss of export contracts, production cuts, and job losses, but also as a powerful institutional catalyst for industrial decarbonization and the integration of Ukrainian producers into European low-carbon value chains. The study reveals a significant divergence in the readiness levels of Ukrainian metallurgical enterprises. While certain companies (e.g., Interpipe) have al-ready deployed EAF technologies, others remain in the planning or early implementation stages of large-scale electric arc furnace projects. The success of this transition will heavily depend on timely access to investment capital, the development of a national MRV system fully aligned with EU standards, and effective state support. The author concludes that a comprehensive adaptation strategy—integrating data transparency, commercial flexibility, and deep technological transformation—will enable Ukrainian metallurgy to not only minimize current losses but also secure long-term competitiveness in the EU market during the post-war reconstruction period.

 


Keywords


CBAM, decarbonisation of metallurgy, steel sector adaptation, low-carbon technologies

References


Datsenko, A. (2025). Peculiarities of adaptation of Ukraine’s metallurgy to the mechanism of cross-border carbon regulation. Zdobutky ekonomiky: perspektyvy ta innovatsii, 17. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15220994

Datsenko, A. (2024). The influence of «CBAM» on the development and competitiveness of the metallurgical industry of Ukraine. Economy and Society, 70. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-70-99

Karpenko, A. & Loza, S. (2025). ESG-threats to the economic security of metallurgy enterprises. Economic Analysis, 35(1), 419—427. https://doi.org/10.35774/econa2025.01.419

Strelchenko, I. & Strelchenko, A. (2024). Metallurgical industry of Ukraine in the context of sustainable competitiveness and post-war reconstruction. Economic Analysis, 34(4), 22—29. https://doi.org/10.35774/econa2024.04.022

Bugayko, D., Hryhorak, M., Katsman, M., Zaporozhets, O., & Borysiuk, A. (2025). Challenges of post-war sustainable development of Ukraine – EU metallurgical products supply chains. Electronic Scientific Journal Intellectualization of Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 32, 62—87. https://doi.org/10.46783/smart-scm/2025-32-5

Chen, Z. Y., Zhao, L. T., Cheng, L., & Qiu, R. X. (2025). How does China respond to the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism? An approach of global trade analysis. Energy Policy, 198, 114486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114486

Dechezleprêtre, A., et al. (2025). Carbon border adjustments: The potential effects of the EU CBAM along the supply chain. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers No. 2025/02. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e8c3d060-en

Devlin, A., Mykhnenko, V., Zagoruichyk, A., Salmon, N., & Soldak, M. (2024). Techno-economic optimisation of steel supply chains in the clean energy transition: A case study of post-war Ukraine. Journal of Cleaner Production, 466, Article 142675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142675

Li, M., Sun, Y., Xia, Y., Yang, Z., Chen, C., Yuan, Y., & Wang, P. (2026). The impacts of Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) on international trade and policy responses: From an economic and environmental equity perspective. Energy Policy, 210, 115014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.115014

Liu, S., & Wei, W. (2025). Green trade barriers and industrial chain resilience: Is green finance still effective? Systems, 13(10), 867. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13100867

Wirdyansyah, D. (2025). Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and its implications for developing economies: A systematic literature review. Indonesian Journal of Energy, 8(29), 162—176. https://doi.org/10.33116/ije.v8i2.292

Zhao, L. T., Chen, Z. Y., Duan, Y. X., & Qiu, R. X. (2023). How will CBAM affect the decarbonisation of steel industry in China? A system dynamics approach. International Journal of Production Research, 62(1), 1—22. https://doi.org/10.10 80/00207543.2023.2285397

Zhong, J., & Pei, J. (2024). Carbon border adjustment mechanism: A systematic literature review of the latest developments. Climate Policy, 24(2), 228—242. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2190074

Received: 22.04.2026

Accepted: 13.05.2026

Published: 29.06.2026




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2026.02.036

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.