Modeling the production function with the account for the change of factors’ output over time on the example of manufacturing industry in Germany

Oleksiy O. Okhten, Alla F. Dasiv

Abstract


The article analyzes production functions, investigates the features of the Cobb-Douglas function in its multiple variations. On the basis of the analysis carried out, as well as the practical needs of modeling the production systems, the necessity of modeling the production function with the account for the change in the output of production factors over time, is substantiated. As well as with the account for the factor of the modern industrial revolution, characterized by the digitalization of manufacturing.

An approach to the development of a function is proposed, which takes into account the change in the output of production factors over time in the context of digitalization. The corresponding production function was modeled based on the example of the manufacturing industry over 2000-2019 in Germany, which is a country that is among the first to introduce modern technologies, including digital ones. The results of modeling the value added using the production function with and without the account for the change in the weight coefficients of the factors over time are presented.

It was found that adding the correction factors that define the change in weight coefficients for the factors of the production function over time increased the accuracy of the calculations. Also, a decrease in the resulting (after taking into account the coefficient change over time) exponent coefficient was revealed in the digitalization factor and its increase in the factor of fixed assets involved in the production process (the cost of machinery and equipment) – the output on fixed assets increases annually, and the output of the digitalization factor decreases by about the same extent.

It was found that since the relative output of digitalization decreases over time, if there is a need to achieve growth in output through digitalization, it has to be carried out at a growing pace, that is, investments should increase over time. In addition, the earlier investments are introduced, the greater the effect they will give. When modeling the sectors of the Ukrainian economy, it’s advisable to use correction coefficients calculated based on the German data, rather than calculate them based on past periods on the basis of Ukrainian data. From the point of view of practical calculations, this is justified not only by the belated repetition of the technological development processes of developed countries by developing ones (that is, Ukrainian enterprises are introducing the same technologies, but with a delay of 5-10 years or more), but also by the greater relevance of German statistics to the needs of modeling.


Keywords


production function, Germany, processing industry, change in the output of factors, digitalization, economic and mathematical modeling

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bakaev, O. O., Gricenko, V. І., Bazhan, L. І. & al. (2005). Economic and Mathematical Models of Economic Growth. Kiev: Naukova Dumka [in Ukrainian].

Blaug, M. (1994). Economic Thought in the Retrospective. Moscow: Delo [In Russian].

Vilchynska, O. M., Panochyshyn, Yu. M., & Kushnir, T. O. (2016). Identifying the possibilities of using the Cobb-Douglas production function as a tool for managing the production resources of the region. Bulletin of Khmelnytsky National University, 2(1), pp. 177-181.

Havryliuk, V. T. (2012). Analysis of the impact of investment on economic growth of the country using production functions. Bulletin of Zaporizhia National University, 4 (16), pp. 73-78.

Hrabovetskyi, B. Ie., & Shvarts, I. V. (2013). Production functions in economic research. Bulletin of SSU. Seriia Ekonomika, 1, pp. 60-68.

Humeniuk, V. Ia. (2000). Advantages and disadvantages of using the Cobb-Douglas function as a tool for managing the production resources of transport enterprises. Bulletin of the National University "Lviv Polytechnic". Problems of economics and management, 391, pp. 157-162.

Madykh, A. A., & Okhten, O. O. (2018). Mo­deling the transformation of the influence of production factors on the economy in the process of formation of the smart industry. Econ. promisl., 4 (84), pp. 26-41. doi: http://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2018.04.026.

Madykh, A. A., Okhten, O. O., & Dasiv, A. F. (2018). Modeling the factor of digitalization of production in the process of formation of the smart industry (on the example of the processing industry of Germany): scientific and analytical report, Kyiv: Institute of Industrial Economics of NAS of Ukraine, 41 р. Retrieved from https://iie.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/madykh_okhten_dasiv_compressed.pdf

Sotnikov, V. S., & Sheptenko, O. V. (2009). Research of the basic tendencies of development and functioning of industrial potential by means of production functions. Scientific works of KNTU. Economic sciences, 15, pp. 155-162.

Sukhorukov, A. I., & Kharazishvili, Yu. M. (2012). Modeling and forecasting of socio-economic development of the regions of Ukraine: monograph. Kyiv: NISS. 368 с.

Cherkashyna, T. S. (2020). Cobb-Douglas production function as an instrument of Ukraine's economic growth policy in the con­ditions of market reforms. Economy and society, 21, pp. 28-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2019-20-15

Iankovoi, V. A. (2017). Application of the CES function and related production functions in economic research. Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanities University. Series: Economics and Management, 23 (2), pp. 156-159. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nvmgu_eim_2017_23%282%29__35

Arrow, K.J. (1962). The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29 (3), pp. 155-173.

Atzori, L., Lera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: a survey. Computer Networks, 54, рр. 2787-2805. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010

Brynjolfsson, E., & McElheran, K. (2016) Data in Action: Data-Driven Decision Making in U.S. Manufacturing. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2722502

OECD, 9А (2021) Fixed assets by activity and by asset, ISIC rev 4. Retrieved from https://stats.oecd.org/In­dex.aspx?Da­taSetCode=SNA_TABLE9A

Jeschke, S., Brecher, C., Song H., & Rawat, D. (2017). Industrial Internet of Things. Cy­ber­manufacturing Systems. Herausgeber: Springer International Publishing Switzerland.

Lasi, H., Kemper, H.-G., Fettke, P., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, (6), рр. 239-242.

Lee, J., Lapira, E., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. (2013). Recent advances and trends in predictive manufacturing systems in big data environment. Manufacturing Letters, 1, рр. 38-41.

Mankiv, G. A., Romer, D., & Weil, D. (1992). Contridution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107 (2), рр. 407-437.

Ranis, G. (1988). Analytics of Development: Dualism. Handbook of Development Economics, 1, 882 p. Amsterdam: North Holland.

Solow, R.M. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39 (3), pp. 312-320.

OECD, 6А (2021). Value added and its components by activity, ISIC rev4. Retrieved from https://stats.oecd.org/In­dex.aspx?Da­taSetCode=SNA_TABLE6A.

Yin, S., & Kaynak, O. (2015). Big Data for Modern Industry: Challenges and Trends. Proceedings of the IEEE, 10(2), рр. 143-146.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2021.01.079

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.